ARSHAKA LAWYERS
Nagamas Building, 3rd Floor, Unit 305
Pusat Niaga Dutamas Fatmawati Blok A1 No. 14 -16Jl. RS Fatmawati Raya, No. 39, Jakarta Selatan – 12150.
Phone : 081316498355
E-mail : arshaka.lawyer@gmail.com
Contact Us
Contact Us
Jl. RS Fatmawati Raya, No. 39, Jakarta Selatan – 12150.
Pembuktian Sederhana Dalam Permohonan Kepailitan Dan PKPU
Pembuktian Sederhana Dalam Permohonan Kepailitan Dan PKPU
Bahwa di dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU (“UU Kepailitan dan PKPU”) tidak mengatur asas pembuktian secara sederhana dapat diterapkan dalam permohonan PKPU, akan tetapi Hakim pada Pengadilan Niaga pada dasarnya dapat menerapkan asas pembuktian sederhana tersebut dalam memeriksa, mengadili dan memutus Permohon PKPU dengan memperhatikan:
1. Asas peradilan sederhana, cepat, dan biaya ringan seperti yang diatur dalam Pasal 4 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman;2. Tujuan dari UU Kepailitan dan PKPU yaitu sarana hukum untuk menyelesaikan masalah utang-piutang secara adil, cepat, terbuka, dan efektif;
3. Pasal 8 ayat (4) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU.
Bahwa agar permohonan PKPU atau pailit yang diajukan oleh Kreditor dapat dikabulkan oleh Pengadilan Niaga, maka Kreditor wajib untuk membuktikan fakta atau keadaan yang terbukti secara sederha yaitu ada dua atau lebih kreditor dan Ada utang yang telah jatuh waktu dan dapat ditagih yang tidak dibayar lunas oleh debitor sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) Jo. Pasal 8 ayat (4) Jo. Pasal 222 ayat (1) dan ayat (3) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU, yang berbunyi:
- Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU:
“Debitor yang mempunyai dua atau lebih Kreditor dan tidak membayar lunas sedikitnya satu utang yang telah jatuh waktu dan dapat ditagih, dinyatakan pailit dengan putusan Pengadilan, baik atas permohonannya sendiri maupun atas permohonan satu atau lebih kreditornya.”
- Pasal 8 ayat (1) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU:
“Permohonan pernyataan pailit harus dikabulkan apabila terdapat fakta atau keadaan yang terbukti secara sederhana bahwa persyaratan untuk dinyatakan pailit sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) telah dipenuhi.”
- Pasal 222 ayat (1) dan ayat (3) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU:
3. Kreditor yang memperkirakan bahwa Debitor tidak dapat melanjutkan membayar utangnya yang sudah jatuh waktu dan dapat ditagih, dapat memohon agar kepada Debitor diberi penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang, untuk memungkinkan Debitor mengajukan rencana perdamaian yang meliputi tawaran pembayaran sebagian atau seluruh utang kepada Kreditornya.”
Adapun yang dimaksud dengan pembuktian secara sederhana dapat kita lihat pada penjelasan Pasal 8 ayat (4) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU, yang berbunyi:
“Yang dimaksud dengan “fakta atau keadaan yang terbukti secara sederhana adalah adanya fakta dua atau lebih Kreditor dan fakta utang yang telah jatuh waktu dan tidak dibayar. Sedangkan perbedaan besarnya jumlah utang yang didalihkan oleh pemohon pailit dan termohon pailit tidak menghalangi dijatuhkannya putusan pernyataan pailit.”
Bahwa lebih lanjut, guna menerapkan asas peradilan cepat dan efektif maka dalam memeriksa, mengadili dan memutus permohonan PKPU dibatasi oleh waktu yang singkat, dimana permohonan PKPU yang diajukan oleh Pemohon PKPU dalam waktu paling lambat 20 (dua puluh) hari sejak tanggal didaftarkannya surat permohonan haruslah diputus oleh Pengadilan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 225 ayat (1) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU.
Bahwa sering terjadi adanya penafsiran berbeda-beda atau inkonsistensi penafsiran di kalangan majelis hakim tentang penerapan pembuktian sederhana. Oleh karena terdapat perbedaan atau inkonsistensi penafsiran pembuktian sederhana tersebut maka dapatlah kita jumpai berbagai permohonan PKPU ditolak oleh Majelis Hakim dengan alasan pembuktiannya tidaklah sederhana.
Oleh karena masih terdapatnya perbedaan penafsiran atas kriteria atau parameter dari terbukti sederhana tersebut, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia telah memberikan pendapat mengenai parameter dari terbukti sederhana adalah pada waktu pembuktian adanya hutang (lihat Pasal 8 ayat (4) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU) sebagaimana termaktub dalam bagian Rapat Kamar Perdata Khusus angka 25 halaman 9 SEMA No. 7 Tahun 2012 tentang Rumusan Hukum Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan.
Gading Yonggar Ditya, S.H.
Gading Yonggar Ditya, S.H.
Gading Yonggar Ditya, S.H.
Partner
Gading started his legal career as an Assistant Public Interest Lawyer at the Jakarta Legal Aid Institute (LBH Jakarta). Then, Gading continued his legal career handling a number of public cases as an Advocacy Staff at the Trade Union Rights Center (TURC) and a Public Interest Lawyer at the Press Legal Aid Institute (LBH Pers).
After that, he focused his practice as a commercial litigation or dispute resolution lawyer at several leading law firms in Jakarta. He represents and accompanies many clients with diverse backgrounds in complex cases including, but not limited to, providing legal advice and/or representation to major national and international companies and state-owned enterprises.
Apart from handling a number of cases, Gading is also listed as an Expert in a number of programs launched by the Government including the provision and construction of telecommunications towers owned by BAKTI Kominfo for the 2021-2023 Fiscal Year. In addition, Gading also has experience as a Legal Consultant for the Financial Services Authority RI in legal audit work in several regions.
Education
• 2013 – Universitas Diponegoro, Bachelor of Law;
• 2018 – Asia Pasific School on Internet Governance, Asian Institute of Technology in Thailand;
• 2021 – Mining Legal Consultant Professional Certification Education organized by the Justitia Training Center.
Liscense
• Holder and Advocate license issued by the Indonesian Bar Association (PERADI) with card number NIA: 20.04344;
• Certified Mining Legal Consultants and Lawyers registered with the Association of Indonesian Mining Legal Consultants and Lawyers (PERKHAPPI) with Card Number 21.11.206.
Wirdan Fauzi, S.H.
Wirdan Fauzi, S.H.
Wirdan Fauzi, S.H.
Partner
Fauzi started his legal career as a Public Interest Lawyer at the Jakarta Legal Aid Institute (LBH Jakarta) and then worked as a researcher at non-governmental organizations namely the People's Coalition for Fisheries Justice (KIARA) and the Rujak Center for Urban Studies.
After that, he focused his practice as a dispute resolution or litigation lawyer at Dafi Munir & Partners Law Firm, one of the leading law firms in Jakarta. He represents and accompanies many clients with diverse backgrounds in complex cases including, but not limited to, providing legal advice and/or representation to major national and international companies and state-owned enterprises.
Education
• 2012 – Universitas Pancasila, Bachelor of Law;• 2015 – Learning Exchange Program held by Alternative Law Groups (ALG), in the Philippines & Namati, in USA.
License
• Holder and Advocate license issued by the Indonesian Bar Association (PERADI) with card number NIA: 15.01917;• Receiver and Administrators who are registeres with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights with a Certificate of Registration of Curators and Administratos number AHU-495AH.04.03-2021.
Ahmad Biky, S.H.
Ahmad Biky, S.H.
.jpeg)
Ahmad Biky, S.H.
Managing Partner
Biky started his legal career as a Public Interest Lawyer at the Jakarta Legal Aid Institute (LBH Jakarta). During his career at LBH Jakarta, Biky wrote a number of published books including David vs Goliath (Studying Strategic Cases in the Labor Sector) published by LBH Jakarta – 2014, and Stories of Citizen Engagement Against Corruption from the Campaign for Social Audit published by Transparency International Indonesia & Open Government – 2014.
After that, he focused his practice as a dispute resolution or litigation attorney at a number of leading law firms in Jakarta including: Gatot Goei & Partners Law Office, Kiagus Ahmad & Associate Law Office and Dafi Munir & Partners Law Office. He represents and accompanies many clients with diverse backgrounds in complex cases including, but not limited to, providing legal advice and/or representation to major national and international companies and state-owned enterprises.
Education
• 2013 – Anti-Corruption School (SAKTI) organized by Indonesian Corruption Watch (ICW);
• 2015 – Foundation Course on Childrens Rights held by Ateno De Manila University Human Rights Center & Save The Children.
License
(PERADI) with card number NIA: 14.01161;
• Receiver and Administrators who are registeres with the Ministry of Law and Human
Rights with a Certificate of Registration of Curators and Administratos number AHU- 269AH.04.03-2020.
Services
Services
1. Business Law and Commercial Litigation
a. Civil or Commercial Litigation;
b. Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution;
c. Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU);
d. Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Financial Services Sector;
e. Consumer Dispute Resolution;
f. Intellectual Property Rights Dispute and Enforcement;
g. Insurance;
h. Mining and Energy;
i. Real Estate and Land Ownership Disputes;
j. Information Technology.
2. Public Litigation
a. Criminal Litigation;
b. Constitutional Litigation (Judicial Review to Constitutional Court and Supreme Court);
c. Administrative Litigation (State Administrative Court);
d. Public Information Disclosure;
e. Press Disputes;
f. Corruption/Anti-Corruption.
3. General Corporate and Commercial Law
a. Merger & Acquisition;
b. Company License;
c. Business Establishment;
d. Banking & Finance;
e. Corporate Restructuring;
f. Contract Arrangement;
g. Company Compliance;
h. Data Protection and Licenses;
i. Foreign Investment;
j. Infrastructure & Construction Projects.
4. Employment
a. Preparation of Work Contracts;
b. Labor Law and Compliance;
c. Work Termination;
d. Outsourcing;
e. Foreign Workers;
f. Labor Licensing;
g. Labor Disputes;
h. Labor Strike;
i. Labor Disputes and Industrial Relations.
5. Anty Monopoli and Business Competition
a. Anti-monopoly Compliance;
b. Conspiracy;
c. Cartel Allegation;
d. Determination Pricing Issues;
e. Abuse of a Dominant Position.
About Us
About Us
Arshaka Lawyers is a law office consisting of lawyers who have extensive previous experience in leading law firms in Indonesia. Our lawyers have more than a decade of experience and expertise in resolving various types of legal disputes, complex litigation, corporate & commercial matters, and alternative dispute resolution.
We focus on our client’s business and provide advice with commercial intelligence and in a responsive and innovative manner to major national and international corporate groups, financial institutions and government agencies. We serve our clients as a team with in-depth- knowledge and solid experience, we work with our clients to ensure the success of their business or interests.
As can be seen from the profile of our lawyers, our lawyers previously worked in leading law firms in Indonesia and experienced in very complex legal disputes or projects representing large national or international clients. In this regard, we can ensure that our clients will receive the highest quality legal services that a reputable law firm can offer at a more competitive legal fee. We are also significantly more efficient than larger law offices in communicating and coordinating so that the work carried out can run efficiently and effectively.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
About us